Skip to main content

Do you boycott films after #MeToo?



It started with Johnny Depp. I wanted to see the new Murder on the Orient Express, but I just couldn't bear to send the message that his (settled out of court) violence towards ex-wife Amber Heard was ok; nor for a single penny of my money to support him or his employees.

Next was Casey Affleck - horrified by his Oscar win despite accusations of sexual harassment, I vowed to never watch a single one of his films, or his brother Ben's (accused - and apologised on Twitter - for groping a woman.) What a lovely family.

Then came some tough ones. I was devastated to cut short Louie (Louis CK's sitcom), Master of None (Aziz Ansari) and House of Cards (Kevin Spacey).

My existing boycotts are about to get harder. Having not realised Johnny Depp was in Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them I actually scored myself a ticket to the premiere in London (a fab night for a Harry Potter nerd) but was gutted to discover he's going to be a major role in the second film. I just can't justify spending any money on the franchise now, even if it makes me sad.

I've been thinking a lot about boycotts and their purpose. Is the idea to sting capitalists (in this case, Hollywood) by withdrawing our DVD purchases and cinema tickets; to shame them with low audience numbers; or simply to make a personal statement to our own conscience - 'I am above this shit'?

And then what's the rule for sneaky viewings? If the company aren't making money from me directly, is it ok? Can I borrow the next Fantastic Beasts DVD from a friend, or buy it from a charity shop? At what point am I supporting violent men?

It can feel like withholding the odd tenner doesn't make much of a difference, unless other people follow suit, in which case it's our own inner moral compass that we set spinning when we indulge our (very) guilty pleasures.

It's hard not to be a human though. For all my fuss around the actors above, I have glaring exceptions. I'm a die-hard Michael Jackson fan, and try not to consider his disgusting behaviour when I'm driving along singing Billie Jean.

Driven by an undying love for Amy Poehler I'm unable to resist rewatching Parks and Recreation despite repeated cameos from Louis CK and a major role for Aziz Ansari; and Chalet Girl is my comfort film for most illnesses, despite starring Ed Westwick.

I justify these in all manner of ways, but ultimately on some level I've made a choice to be ok with some terrible men, and not with others. Believe me, it doesn't sit well - but somehow a life without these songs that have come to mean so much to me, about moments in my life, feels like self-flagellation more than giving up certain blockbusters. Even as I write this, I'm trying desperately to think of a loophole - does it matter now he's dead? Does it matter if I pretend they are someone else's songs? What about if I consider the abuse he experienced at the hands of his father?

But I know that ultimately it's a poor moral choice that I have to live with.

Do you boycott? It can feel in the #MeToo era that there's almost nothing left to watch.

I don't really have any answers. I suppose I should be voicing my complaints to film companies and TV studios. Many have - correctly - terminated contracts with accused actors, but as mentioned, Casey Affleck's recent Oscar sends a pretty crappy message.

I'm curious about what other people do - are their actors you avoid and others whose bad behaviour you brush under the carpet in the name of art (or, let's be honest, Chalet Girl)? Sometimes it can feel like self-punishment rather than necessarily hurting the aggressors, but perhaps our money and attention are our strongest weapon in the fight against sexual violence.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Let's all stop groping in nightclubs, yeah?

Ah my university days... I spent hours reading in my little dorm room, wandering my adoptive city (Liverpool) and dancing all night to music I couldn't stand (The Killers were at their height). Oh, and, of course, being felt up by men in clubs. Having my bum squeezed at the bar, a creeping hand slide around my waist, or my chest brushed as I walked to the toilet was, for me, as much of a university experience as hangovers and Hollyoaks. In fact, age has nothing to do with it - it was happening when I was 16, and even now in my 30s I've been grabbed on a night out. The most recent time was out with my husband, even though he had his arm around me. (Secretly I was quite pleased about that one, because I am always trying to explain to him how common this creepy behaviour is, and it made me feel weirdly justified.) Basically anytime I've been somewhere dark, with music playing, drinks flowing and strangers around, my body has been quite literally up for grabs. I mean - w...
Post a Comment
Read more

What I liked about the rape depiction in Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri

I've finally received my pre-ordered DVD of Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri, which I've been desperate to see since I missed it at the cinemas. It sounds perverse, but I was so excited to see a film about rape, especially from an older female's perspective, nominated for so many awards and generally raising awareness of a difficult subject. It definitely fits my strange little wheelhouse of niche interests (Peanuts; people who identify as Ravenclaw; sexual violence in the media; cats). In a nutshell the film is about Mildred Hayes (Frances McDormand), a fearsome tiger of a woman left devastated by the rape and murder of her teenage daughter Angela. Seven months after the crime, no one has been arrested and, tired of waiting for justice, Mildred rents three billboards. On them she writes: 'Raped while dying/ And still no arrests? / How come, Chief Willoughby?' The idea of course being to rattle the local police into action. The film focuses on her in...
Post a Comment
Read more

Shake-up for the Irish legal system when it comes to rape

Did you know that the rules in rape courts are different in Ireland? Unlike in the rest of the UK, judges aren't obliged to inform jurors in cases of sexual violence about the dangers of believing rape myths . This needs to change, according to an Irish expert on sexual offences. Dr Susan Leahy (author of Sexual Offending in Ireland: Laws, Procedures and Punishments) has said that Irish judges should receive guidance on how to warn juries about prejudicial stereotypes and myths - for example, any woman flashing so much as an ankle bone must be 'asking for it', or the idea that if you're not a virgin you're clearly up for anything. 
 She's quoted in the Irish Times as saying: “When they’re in the courtroom with the wigs and gowns, jurors can get distracted from the issue of consent with issues like ‘didn’t she behave foolishly’ or ‘God should she really have drunk that much.’” 
 Instructions from a judge could “bring the jury back to reality. Before the...
Post a Comment
Read more